Re: Request for review of blocking deliverables for Fedora 25

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 16/09/16, Jan Kurik wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Colin Walters <walters@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016, at 04:14 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> may I request any feedback on this topic, and/or adding this topic to
> >> the next Cloud WG meeting agenda ?
> >
> > It'd be nice to make Atomic Host a blocking deliverable - I think
> > we have sufficient experience now and manpower to do that.
> 
> How this should work ? I am asking because Atomic is delivered
> bi-weekly and Fedora releases are delivered two times a year. Perhaps
> delivering the last released Atomic build before Fedora release GA
> date might work. Any other/better ideas how this should be
> synchronized ?
This is my understanding too. We sync up Atomic host with the latest
released Fedora GA, and then follow on our normal 2-week release cycle.
This does not make the 2 week atomic into the official 6month old
release cycle story.

Kushal
-- 
Fedora Cloud Engineer
CPython Core Developer
https://kushaldas.in
https://dgplug.org
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list -- cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux