> Adding rel-eng. They might be able to help us out more on this topic. Could you maybe add a little bit more information? Like what tree is expected to be there etc? Presumably this is the two week release? Peter > On 08/23/2016 10:09 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> The atomic ISO images are using the wrong tree. The images built on >> 8/23 [1] yield the following system after an install: >> >> -bash-4.3# rpm-ostree status >> TIMESTAMP (UTC) VERSION ID OSNAME REFSPEC >> * 2016-06-15 09:57:04 24.39 2c7d41e8a6 fedora-atomic fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/24/x86_64/docker-host >> >> The tree it has on the ISO is from 06/15. Whereas the latest tree is >> actually something like this: >> >> -bash-4.3# rpm-ostree status >> State: idle >> Deployments: >> fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/24/x86_64/docker-host >> Version: 24.25 (2016-08-23 12:30:17) >> Commit: 29330133bb883ae3e257ceb40676bb21a59aecd98eb3068f0d3f8675a12ab4f3 >> OSName: fedora-atomic >> GPGSignature: (unsigned) >> >> ● fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/24/x86_64/docker-host >> Version: 24.13 (2016-08-09 04:25:51) >> Commit: 900457420c4881a937e9167fc6cde670cbada858e3290943417279a76708be75 >> OSName: fedora-atomic >> GPGSignature: (unsigned) >> >> >> [1] - https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose//twoweek/Fedora-Atomic-24-20160823.0/compose/Atomic/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Atomic-dvd-x86_64-24-20160823.0.iso >> > _______________________________________________ > cloud mailing list > cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
