Hey Adam, For the Cloud bug, kushal built an image today and we verified this issue. I don't know of anyone else who is going to build their own image to test this. Is it possible for us to push to stable with the 1 karma? Dusty On 06/07/2016 11:59 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey folks! > > Unfortunately we're still waiting on a fix for > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320273 before we can build > a release candidate. While we're waiting, though, as well as doing the > missing validation tests on the current nominated nightly, it'd be > useful for folks to test and karma some FE / blocker updates: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b0494cdc04 (anaconda) > fixes several FEs. If you aren't set up to build your own installer > image, you can boot a live image and update the anaconda package before > running the live installer - that's a decent way to test most aspects. > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-714119426f (cloud- > utils) fixes a blocker bug in the cloud images. I think you need to be > able to build a Cloud image to be able to fully test the fix, which is > why I'm CCing cloud@ :) > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a7c55ce2fa (firefox) > fixes an FE but also introduces quite a lot more change, so it'd be > good to have it carefully tested; if everyone who uses firefox could > update to it and check all their usual stuff works, that'd be great. > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-7e822d9239 (qt5) > fixes a KDE crasher; it'd be great if KDE folks could update to it, > make sure their stuff all still works normally, and +1 it if so. > > There's also a flock of FTBFS / dependency rebuild fixes: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a88e158b2c > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-6166f85051 > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a7af5e90d1 > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-54554f20d4 > > for those all that's really needed is to verify that they have no > dependency issues, and ideally that they start up and do...something > (or if they're libraries, that something based on them starts up and > works). > > Thanks a lot folks! > _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx