On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 10:20:13AM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote: > On 04/22/2016 09:44 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 06:14:05PM -0400, Justin W. Flory wrote: >> On 04/21/2016 05:10 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >>> On 04/21/2016 05:04 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: >>>> I can't make tonight's Magazine meeting, but I'm +1 to get this out >>>> ASAP. I've moved this article to Pending Review, but I already >>>> reviewed it and it looks fine. I added a couple additional links for >>>> SEO power. >>>> >>>> Anything Justin OK's for schedule for this is fine by me, assume >>>> +1. :-) And I'll be happy to help with social media, just please leave >>>> me an email or IRC message to do so and I'll catch it in the morning. >>> >>> I'd like to put this up too, but I don't think we've settled the >>> question on 32-bit that Dennis raised. Will check again. >>> >> >> Do we still want to aim for publishing this tomorrow? In the meeting, we >> agreed to publish it Friday, but if it's not ready or the questionable part >> can't be edited out, let's definitely hold on this. > > The article apparently was left in Scheduled status -- I moved it back > to > Pending Review status, and Patrick Uiterwijk kindly stripped it > from the Fedora Planet so it wouldn't confuse anyone. It was out > there for a few hours, though, FYI. > > > Too late phoronix picked it up: > > http://phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Fedora-Cloud-32-bit-Dead > > Looks like we might as well go ahead with it now. Let me be very clear and avoid confusion: :-) * This post has been pulled back from the Magazine and the Planet. It will 404 for page visitors. * I will expect Joe B from the Cloud WG to tell us authoritatively through the *marketing* list exactly what should happen next, since he (correctly) raised the issue of ensuring zero confusion over publishing these articles. Ideally this should have been settled between Cloud WG and rel-eng before an article was proposed. But failing that, we shouldn't schedule any Magazine post about changes in deliverables without clearly knowing it's decided. (To be fair, that seemed to be the case for at least a week, until dgilmore raised an objection.) Better communication will fix similar problems in the future. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
