Hi all, Somehow despite me sending this last night - this was published. How can we prevent communication breakdowns like this in the future? This was sent prior to or during the magazine meeting, if I'm not mistaken. If there's *any* uncertainty around something like this, it should not be published. Best, jzb On 04/21/2016 05:10 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On 04/21/2016 05:04 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: >> I can't make tonight's Magazine meeting, but I'm +1 to get this out >> ASAP. I've moved this article to Pending Review, but I already >> reviewed it and it looks fine. I added a couple additional links for >> SEO power. >> >> Anything Justin OK's for schedule for this is fine by me, assume >> +1. :-) And I'll be happy to help with social media, just please leave >> me an email or IRC message to do so and I'll catch it in the morning. > > I'd like to put this up too, but I don't think we've settled the > question on 32-bit that Dennis raised. Will check again. > -- Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS jzb@xxxxxxxxxx | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx