Re: [Marketing] Re: [MAGAZINE PROPOSAL] Fwd: [DRAFT] Why we're retiring 32-bit Images (was Re: Retiring 32-bit images)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 11:43 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> if a dracut i686 build fails the dracut build fails and nothing changes, the 
> compose is not blocked.  your view here is not quite the reality of the world. 
> moving i686 to secondary does not change that.

well, wait, moving i686 to secondary *does* change that, doesn't it? If
i686 is secondary, and a dracut i686 build fails, then the dracut
x86_64 and armhfp builds will still get tagged, right? Just like right
now, if dracut fails to build on aarch64 but succeeds on the primary
arches, those primary arch builds get tagged.

> particullary in the way releng 
> is looking to redefine secondary arches.

I would like to read more about this 'redefinition'. Where can I?
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux