Re: [cloud] #148: Container "Packager" Guildelines and Naming Conventions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



#148: Container "Packager" Guildelines and Naming Conventions
-------------------------+---------------------
 Reporter:  maxamillion  |       Owner:
     Type:  task         |      Status:  new
 Priority:  normal       |   Milestone:  Future
Component:  ---          |  Resolution:
 Keywords:  meeting      |
-------------------------+---------------------

Comment (by kushal):

 Replying to [comment:4 sankarshan]:
 > Replying to [comment:1 kushal]:
 > > I guess we have to add more details about what all is allowed to be in
 > > the containers. Like can we get arbitrary things from Internet into
 > > those containers? Say a web application which is yet to be packaged in
 > > Fedora as an rpm.
 > >
 >
 > That is a different aspect is it not? An individual developer should be
 able to build off the "official"/"blessed" base image and layer additional
 components to create a mesh of containers delivering that service. In a
 somewhat ideal world, the availability of CDK etc should encourage the
 producers of containers to seek formal inclusion in the registry.

 It is actually very much part of this discussion as we are formalizing the
 way one can build up an image on official Fedora Infrastructure. As
 matthew mentioned in the comment above, we clearly have to define what can
 be called/build/distributed as Fedora image.

 >
 > > We also have to define the relationships (and how) between the images.
 > > Like the Requires in the rpm spec files. We know for sure that most of
 > > the actual applications will require more than one container running.
 > >
 >
 > Any non-trivial containerized service will have multiple containers
 being managed. The specific gate of requiring the application to be
 available as an RPM may or, may not provide the added benefit of build
 system integrity providing a semblance of security checks.
 >
 I guess we both are saying the same things here.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/148#comment:5>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux