Re: [urgent] Review container packager guidelines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 05:54:20PM +0530, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
> <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Layered_Docker_Image_Build_Service#Content_Tracking.2C_Automatic_Rebuilds>
> mentions "But we don't want to block having the basic build service in
> place on that; initially, updates will need to be initiated by the
> container packager."
> 
> This begets 2 questions - (a) what is the means to identify the images
> which have gone stale because packagers have not updated (b) how to
> packagers receive notifications that the images would need to be
> rebuilt

Good question. I think I wrote the sentence you're quoting, so I guess
I have some responsibility to answer. :)

And, I think the answer is: anything that we work on here should be
lightweight, and any significant work should instead go to the
system for automatic rebuilds.

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux