On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 02:19:19AM -0000, hannes@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> What is the motivation for the eager deletion of the official Fedora
> VM images (AMIs) from EC2? The image for 21 is already gone even
> though it is not even two years old. Ubuntu is keeping the images
> around much longer.
Which AMI ID are you looking for, in which regions? We had a problem
Fedora 21 for HVM in us-west-2. I can dig up the AMI ID if you'd like. Id' have to look at our past CI builds. This is how we're searching for them:
where we accidentally had many _unreleased_ snapshots consuming space
and costing us significant money, and recently cleaned those up.
However, all of the _released_ images back to F18 should still be
there. In US East for F21, we have ami-d2d999ba for F21 PV and
ami-acd999c4 and ami-78bafa10 for HVM. (I'm not sure offhand what the
distinction between those other two is -- I'm looking this up in the
middle of a meeting...)
Of course, we *do* strongly recommend using the supported releases, but
we understand that it's important to have time to transition and that
sometimes old images are useful for testing, too.
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hannes Schmidt
Software Engineer
Center for Biomolecular Science and Engineering
Center for Biomolecular Science and Engineering
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx