On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 10:37:05AM +0100, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > > So EOL implies that no one should ever be able to launch a VM for it? > > Makes no sense to me. > It's no longer receiving updates, so that does actually make sense. > Can you describe the use case for an EOL release that might persuade us > that we should continue paying for the storage required to host EOL AMIs > and risking that users might deploy them without realizing they are no > longer receiving security updates? Actually, let me turn that around. Hannes, what can we do to make it so that it's really easy for you to just switch to using newer releases as they come out? -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
