On 17/12/15, Sudhir D wrote: > > <snip> > >>But it is not used as the default networking configuration stack by any > >>existing Fedora deliverable of which I'm aware. > >> > >Correct in that point. > > > >>> We are > >>>talking about enabling it as default networking stack. > > This comes at a cost. It sounds more like 'gut feeling' to have networkd as > default because we (fedora) have to be 'first' ? > Just sighting the foundation statement, > <snip> > *First* represents our commitment to innovation. We are not content to let > others do all the heavy lifting on our behalf; we provide the latest in > stable and robust, useful, and powerful free software in our Fedora > distribution. > </snip> > > I haven't worked on networkd myself, so you can beat me on that.. but from > other responses to this thread I see that networkd still has to cover some > ground before we label it as latest in stable and robust. I don't want to > sound conservative, but remember, once we make it default it won't look good > on us to retract if there are lot of issues. If you read the other replies in the thread from the people who are already using networkd, you will find it is actually the opposite. It is very much stable, and robust, and latest in network stack (CoreOS is using it as default from 2014). Kushal -- Fedora Cloud Engineer CPython Core Developer CentOS Cloud SIG lead http://kushaldas.in _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
