On 10/28/2015 03:03 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > Could you provide a bit more context without necessarily offering your > suggestions? It's somewhat hard to discuss this without it going > everywhere without some kind of background into the overlaps or > disparities that you see. I can try to give some context, and yes we probably need some scope. To be clear, this isn't so much disparities/overlaps that *I* see - I just took the AI to start the discussion. Cloud ticket 127 from roshi opened the discussion about the server WG wanting "to do some coordination with workstation and cloud" and asked for brainstorming. And then discussion followed which I won't try to summarize because I may not do it justice, so please see [1]. Some useful questions, though: - Does the current set of editions make sense, as produced by the Cloud and Server WG? - Is the distinction between Cloud and Server wrong? There's a lot of history here - the Cloud group really started as a place to look at packaging OpenStack, OpenShift, Eucalyptus, CloudStack for Fedora. Then it evolved into cloud images and then a focus on Atomic. - Should we have a "server" image in the cloud? Is the current suite of editions confusing? And most importantly - what started the initial initial conversation, how should the Cloud & Server folks work together next release? [1] https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/127 -- Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS jzb@xxxxxxxxxx | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
