Re: Fedora Cloud website ideas?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Any other feedback for Mo?

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 09:16:33AM -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> Hi :)
> 
> Since Atomic will be the primary focus of this WG (F24+,) the
> presentation of the Atomic and cloud images on the main Fedora
> website should be updated to reflect that. (See [1] and [2].)
> 
> Last week, Matthew and I talked about how we might do this; the idea
> we thought might work best is the following:
> 
> --
> 
> - Consider replacing the “Cloud” edition slot on the front of
> getfedora.org with a Fedora “Atomic” edition brand.
> 
> 
> - Convert getfedora.org/cloud to focus instead solely on Atomic
> (maybe redoing the URL to getfedora.org/atomic.
> 
> 
> - Build out a separate cloud image resource site (similar to
> arm.fedoraproject.org, which is focused on all ARM-related builds
> across Fedora) with the full set of Cloud Base images (and maybe
> Fedora Docker containers too?) Then, pull these in to the Atomic
> edition site via a link in the “Other Downloads” section. (cross
> link back to atomic from cloud.fpo too.)
> 
> --
> 
> 
> I find it hard to understand if something like this might work
> without visuals, so I put together a (very, super-duper,
> fantastically rough) mockup for this new cloud.fedoraproject.org:
> 
> https://github.com/fedoradesign/fedora-spins/blob/master/cloud/cloud-mockup_front-page.png
> 
> I pretty much just threw it into the arm.fpo template; it's quite a
> bit more cluttered in terms of instructions / explanation needed for
> various image types than arm.fpo, so I think the layout should be
> reconfigured quite a bit to get rid of the cluttered feel.
> 
> 
> That being said -
> 
> - Do you think a site like this for the base cloud images would work
> well, given enough prominence on the main Fedora website as well as
> the Atomic product site? Is this the kind of list of images/AMIs a
> cloud image user is going to find most helpful?
> 
> - Should the docker image live on here? Or would that be better
> served by a more generic 'other images' site for Fedora images?
> 
> - Is the installable image a cloud base image or an atomic image?
> Who would use it and why? Does it belong here as well?
> 
> 
> ~m
> 
> 
> [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/cloud/2015-September/005832.html
> 
> [2] http://blog.linuxgrrl.com/2015/09/15/fedora-atomic-logo-idea/
> _______________________________________________
> cloud mailing list
> cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux