Re: Mo's proposed fedora atomic logo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matthew Miller" <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Fedora Cloud SIG" <cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 1:37:47 PM
> Subject: Re: Mo's proposed fedora atomic logo
> 
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 09:54:39PM +0200, Haïkel wrote:
> > But if the council allows us to do so, I'd like to keep the colored logo
> > for Fedora Cloud as we don't want to give the impression that it's not an
> > official product or less supported that it actually is.
> 
> We have a lot of official Fedora -- let's avoid the word "product" here
> just for unambiguity -- "things-we-produce" which get the
> less-prominent logo, including the release-blocking KDE spin. These
> aren't less _Fedora_ than Cloud / Server / Workstation are today —
> they're just not in the "Editions" bucket.
> 
> The color vs. gray representation comes from the Design team, not the
> Council. If cloud WG wants to ask the Council to have four editions,
> Workstation / Server / Cloud / Atomic, rather than pivoting to
> Workstation / Server / Atomic.... well, I'm not opposed to the
> _request_ but do obviously have an opinion.

If I didn't already know about the cloud base image as its own
WG and such, I would have looked for it as a variant of the Server
product. 


> 
> Restating that opinion for the record: we worked on the Editions (née
> Products) proposal for a long time, coming from a lot of different
> possible directions, and we settled on asking for Editions which aim
> for relatively narrow use cases with specific user targets, with the
> goal of growing Fedora in new ways. Even though all of our work on the
> Cloud Base image has been awesome (and I hope useful to people), it
> never really fit that, especially without some of the things like SCLs
> for language stacks that would have provided a good story. So, some 80%
> of my enthusiasm for Fedora Atomic comes simply because it *does* fit
> that picture so well. (That I also think it's a major step in OS
> evolution is just... icing on the cake.)
> 
> --
> Matthew Miller
> <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Fedora Project Leader
> _______________________________________________
> cloud mailing list
> cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> 
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux