On Wed, Aug 26, 2015, at 03:00 PM, Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets wrote: > 1. The new primary focus of the WG will be the atomic cloud image. Can we try to consistently say "Atomic Host" when we mean that? There's a number of things under the projectatomic/ umbrella now, and while I know it's convenient often to shorthand, at least in semi-official text like this I think it's worth spelling out. Also, "the image" is a bit misleading because in contrast to the traditional cloud image, Atomic Host also supports bare metal and soon PXE-to-Live which is a stateless approach to bare metal. Something like s/atomic cloud image/Atomic Host model/ ? > 2. The cloud base image will remain. Random aside...I think it'd also be useful to improve ImageFactory so it's more convenient to use, and have it be an official part of the Cloud WG and promoted. A lot of advanced consumers have been baking their own images for quite a while for many reasons, and IMO we should better support that. I.e. make this better: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/spin-kickstarts.git/tree/fedora-cloud-base.ks#n12 > 3. The group will also be looking to improve and reduce the size of the > Fedora Docker image. Also worth noting the Atomic Host model really wants the Docker image to work, so having it be in a separate group is slightly strange. Not a big deal though. _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
