On 08/18/2015 08:34 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Aug 18, 2015 5:54 PM, "Joe Brockmeier" <jzb@xxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:jzb@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >> We also will continue to do the base cloud image - that won't go away - >> but it won't be the focus of the working group or its marketing. > > If it won't be the focus of the cloud work group, who do you expect to > monitor its creation and correct operation? I worry that it will fall > by the wayside and bit rot into a state of disrepair. Realized this morning that I responded face-to-face on this but not in email. D'oh! Most of the work that would go into making the base image is happening already. We need to test it, but there doesn't seem to be a lot of churn or major lifting required to keep creating the image. We don't seem to have a lot of ideas for making the image more interesting - so there won't be a lot of work from release to release there. (If we were proposing a radical overhaul of some sort and saying "it's not the main focus" then I would agree it's going to be problematic.) Does anybody else feel we are unable to maintain the image as a sort of basic offering for folks not ready to jump on Atomic? Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS jzb@xxxxxxxxxx | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
