TBH, I'm not sure what can be done from the outside either.
Not part of either the SCL team or FPC, all I see is what tickets and meeting logs I can find. So I'm not close enough to the issues either side is bringing up to understand if there's a "customer" argument to be made for "perfect is the enemy of good" in this case.
Not part of either the SCL team or FPC, all I see is what tickets and meeting logs I can find. So I'm not close enough to the issues either side is bringing up to understand if there's a "customer" argument to be made for "perfect is the enemy of good" in this case.
I just know I really like SCLs, how they work, and the capabilities. It's a big differentiator for the distro at large, and could be really useful for the envisioned Cloud end-user. I don't want to step on nuanced discussions of over 18+ months though.
- Matt M
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Joe Brockmeier <jzb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 07/10/2015 04:59 PM, Matt Micene wrote:
> I think the Cloud SIG should be jumping up and down on getting SCLs back
> on track.
What would this entail? I haven't been following that closely. I'm aware
that SCLs have been... contentious.
--
Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS
jzb@xxxxxxxxxx | http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
