On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Matt Micene <nzwulfin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> But in order to be really useful unless they're all-in on Fedora, many >> people will want the python version for their >> infrastructure/environment, not whichever python we happen to ship in a >> given release. > > > That's always been the case and why software collections came about. > Rewriting system tools to make it easier for someone who might like to use a > different version of python at /usr/bin sounds like overkill. A lot EC2 > AMIs, public and private, are 8GB+ snapshots with 2GB+ of OS installed. > > I may be "broken record"ing but I'm still seeing context switches between > the cloud "flavors" (atomic, docker base, cloud-ified server). We need to > be careful were making the right changes to the right "flavor". Ripping Yes, please. It's gotten to the point where I don't even know what the Cloud Edition actually is any longer. It was confusing enough with the changes from F21->F22, and now (I thought) we basically are "dropping" all of the Atomic flavors that were done in F22 because Fedora moves to slow. So what is left, what are the images, and what are they based on? So confused. josh _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
