On 05/17/2015 08:23 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 07:43:38PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 07:18:05PM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote: >>> So. Some new information. Looks like there is a new docker in testing [1] >>> that does not have this problem. We need to add karma to this. Please test >>> and upvote/downvote! >>> Matt should I still open a bug for this issue so it can be proposed as >>> a freezeexception? >> Yes -- otherwise it won't get included in the composes and will be >> shipped as a zero-day update. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222352 > > It would suck if we shipped F22 atomic with a Docker that can't run > apache :( > _______________________________________________ > cloud mailing list > cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct We have been shipping a /run on tmpfs docker for some time. If the docker image has /run/httpd the docker command is supposed to copy the contents in the images /run onto the tmpfs. If this is not happening it is a bug. Of course httpd should be able to handle the fact that /run/httpd does not exists and create it. _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
