On 04/14/2015 09:50 AM, Colin Walters wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015, at 09:41 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 08:31:49AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >>> Here's what I'd say, lemme know if this sounds sane: >> [...] >>> So we've decided that while the technologies are maturing so rapidly, >>> it's better have a fast-moving remix or spin that gives users the >>> opportunity to use a Fedora-based Atomic Host and gives our developers >>> the ability to move fast and break things if needed." >> >> That works for me. Any volunteers for actually working on making >> http://atomic.fedoraproject.org/? > > And to clarify, we're then backing out all of the Atomic bits in Fedora 22 > mainline rel-eng such as the repository and cloud image, vagrant box, > and installer? No - the plan is still to deliver F22 Atomic, though it's non-blocking. But we will not be doing an "official" F23 Atomic. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb@xxxxxxxxxx | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
