On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:24:20AM -0700, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: > > I don't know about Microsoft, but Atomic aims to be a lot more than > > just a "boot to docker" platform, including application orchestration. > Can't I do that with a CentOS Atomic build? Oh, of course. The plan being discussed is that development will land first in Fedora, on a two-week cycle, and then flow to CentOS. So, if you want to engage early, Fedora Atomic is the place — especially if you want to be involved in shaping the direction, but also if you want to follow the leading edge of fast-moving Atomic development. If you're looking to deploy primarily as an end-user, CentOS Atomic might be what you want. With my Fedora hat on, I think there's space for early adopters in Fedora too (and by design, Atomic actually should make it fairly easy to move back and forth as appropriate without much hassle). And of course, with my employer's hat on, if you want certification and support, RHEL Atomic is always there for you (on a still fast but even more conservative cycle). -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
