On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 06:27:13PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015, at 12:56 PM, Matt Micene wrote: > > > I'd be in favor of pulling NetworkManager.? It still seems that network is > > the way for "server" class systems to handle networking > > It's not that simple, at least for Atomic, because the *exact same* tree > in Fedora 22 can also be deployed on bare metal, and NetworkManager > handles far more networking types than the legacy network package. You have a good point, but just because we have to have NetworkManager in the image does it mean we have to use it? I think we get some benefit (testing overlap, etc) by having the Fedora Atomic Cloud and Fedora Cloud Base images being pretty similar. If the Cloud Base moves to NetworkManager then I guess this point would be moot. If it moves to systemd-networkd then I would propose that the Fedora Atomic Cloud image do the same. Dusty _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
