Is there a possibility of an Atomic Edition that doesn't shift the Cloud Edition focus away from being a good base? Atomic is a specialized case for general cloud workloads, and containerizing everything probably won't be a near time thing.
But then, I don't know what constitutes criteria for a top level edition vs a spin.
-Matt M
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Adam Miller <maxamillion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
FWIW +1 for Spin (A)On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Joe Brockmeier <jzb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03/10/2015 02:53 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> So, I'm wondering if for F22 (or F23, if we feel like that ship is out
>> in the harbor losing sight of land already), we want to do one of two
>> things:
>>
>> A. Move Atomic out of the Cloud Edition, and treat it as a spin, with a
>> home at "http://atomic.fedoraproject.org/" (not currently valid),
>> similar to http://kde.fedoraproject.org — with its own design, theming,
>> etc.
>>
>> Here, the Cloud WG / Cloud SIG would focus more on cloud/virt-guest
>> issues, and possible also cloud infrastructure (openstack,
>> eucalyptus, etc., which we have kind of let fall to the wayside).
>> The Cloud Base image would be the primary Fedora Edition, and Fedora
>> Atomic would be more ... stand-alone.
>>
>> B. The other way around: double down on Atomic as the primary thing the
>> Cloud WG releases as the Fedora cloud product. Here, the focus would be
>> more on containers as the basis for the future of "cattle-style"
>> scale-out computing, and Atomic as Fedora's cool solution for that.
>> The Cloud Base image would be the one changed into a spin — after
>> all, going back to the Lego metaphor for the Fedora editions, the
>> products are supposed to be focused on "batteries included"
>> solutions, and while an awesome building block, the minimal base
>> doesn't quite do that.
>>
>> C. Nah, keep doing the two different things and present in parallel, as
>> we've been doing.
>
> Let's discuss this at this week's meeting? My gut is to pursue Atomic as
> a spin (A) rather than asking the Cloud WG to double-down on Atomic, but
> maybe the rest of the Working Group feels differently...
>
-AdamM
> Best,
>
> jzb
> --
> Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst
> jzb@xxxxxxxxxx | http://community.redhat.com/
> Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cloud mailing list
> cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
>
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
