On 11/03/2014 11:51 PM, Mike Ruckman wrote: > On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 07:25:28PM -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> I would love to get rid of the 32bit AMIs. That being said, is this a "knee jerk" >> reaction? Typically it's best to make changes like this with planning involved >> and sufficient notice of the change so the community can prepare. >> >> Again, I'm all for getting rid of them. Just want to make sure we think about everything. >> >> Dusty > > I wasn't meaning it to come across as a knee jerk reaction - I was just curious > after thinking about who *uses* a 32bit image when a 64bit is available? > Especially for cloud where 64bit is supported everywhere someone might be > launching our image from. Indeed. Given the way things work in Fedora, I didn't imagine that saying "yes, we should get rid of these if there's not a reason to keep them" meant they'd disappear immediately. (If only things happened that quickly...) > The thing I thought about was perhaps there's some package people run on a > regular basis that was only available in 32bit - but then again, if it was a > commonly used package it's likely (if not for certain) there is a x86_64 version > of it in the repos already. > > All that being said, I just figured I'd ask if we still need a 32bit AMI. I was > counting on everyone else having more background knowledge into this than I > have :) Do we have any way of seeing how many people actually use the 32-bit AMI on AWS? Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb@xxxxxxxxxx | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
