On 09/29/2014 09:16 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > Okay, so, I went through the IRC logs, e-mail archives, > https://github.com/fedora-cloud/, and tickets. I identified this last of the > the most active cloud SIG members, and I think that the voting WG membership > should reflect this. This ends up dropping quite a few of the active > members, which I think is okay -- it's not a black mark or anything. We've > been operating very well with a blurred line and now formal distinction, and > this is just meant to bring the list into sync with activity. Should we have a "speak up by X date or hold your peace" on this? (I generally favor lazy consensus, 72 hours.) Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb@xxxxxxxxxx | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
