2014-09-29 16:16 GMT+02:00 Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > Okay, so, I went through the IRC logs, e-mail archives, > https://github.com/fedora-cloud/, and tickets. I identified this last of the > the most active cloud SIG members, and I think that the voting WG membership > should reflect this. This ends up dropping quite a few of the active > members, which I think is okay -- it's not a black mark or anything. We've > been operating very well with a blurred line and now formal distinction, and > this is just meant to bring the list into sync with activity. > > If you're on this list but feel like you shouldn't be, speak up. (If, for > example, you're really not going to have time over the *next* three months.) > And if you aren't but think you really should be, just say so -- in private > or here or whatever -- I'm not meaning to leave out anyone who is actively > involved and I easily could have missed relevant activity not represented by > the sources above (and also, I haven't had much coffee yet this morning.) > > So, proposed new slate: > > * Andy Grimm (agrimm) > * Dusty Mabe (dustymabe) > * Ian McLeod (imcleod) > * Jared Smith (jsmith) > * Joe Brockmeier (jzb) > * Haïkel Guémar (number80) > * David Gay (oddshocks) > * Mike Ruckmman (roshi) > * Scott Collier (scollier) > > (Why yes, that is in alphabetical order by IRC nick.) > Just to speak about the other people that are not me, they are all worthy to join the WG. I'm particularly excited to have representatives from doc & QA which will be important topics in the next releases. Products without documentation and QA are not really products, no matter how great they are ;-) > You'll notice I left _myself_ off. That's not because of not caring, but > because of that "not having time over the next few months" thing — I really > need to focus on FPL duties. And, it's also because Red Hat is in the > process of hiring someone to replace my old role focusing on Fedora Cloud. > I'm not going to name names until the ink is dry, but it's someone who will > have no trouble jumping into the mix on merit in short order. (I'm also > really not concerned about number of members, by the way -- I think we > shouldn't make 9 a magic number and adjust up and down based on activity.) > *nods* I'd like to thank you for your good services in the Cloud SIG then Cloud WG, you did great :) And I assume that everyone else wants the WG to remain open to any Cloud SIG member. Since we're using lazy consensus, as long as we keep membership at a reasonable level, it's not a problem to add few members. Regards, H. > > -- > Matthew Miller > <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Fedora Project Leader > _______________________________________________ > cloud mailing list > cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
