On 07/24/2014 10:38 AM, Haïkel wrote: > At this stage, Cockpit brings no value to regular cloud images. Cloud > users rather use the API and console provided by their providers or > regular tools. That was my thinking, but wasn't sure if I was missing something. > Beside that goes against the effort of trimming down cloud images Also - the normal cloud images *can* be updated to include Cockpit later if someone wants to have Cockpit in their AMI or whatever, yeah? So - I think we're agreed on that? Any -1's to omitting Cockpit? Thanks, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb@xxxxxxxxxx | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
