Re: [cloud] #44: hey we should have a vagrant base box

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



#44: hey we should have a vagrant base box
--------------------+---------------------
 Reporter:  mattdm  |       Owner:
     Type:  task    |      Status:  new
 Priority:  normal  |   Milestone:  Future
Component:  ---     |  Resolution:
 Keywords:          |
--------------------+---------------------

Comment (by purpleidea):

 > One issue with building a vagrant image (at least for the default
 virtualbox provider), is that the guest additions are kernel modules that
 aren't upstream, so can't be included in fedora (as far as I am aware).

 Agreed. Which is another reason why I built everything on vagrant-libvirt
 which has nothing to do with virtualbox.

 When need help packaging upstream vagrant with vagrant-libvirt. If anyone
 can help out who has RPM+Ruby skills, it would be much appreciated!

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/44#comment:13>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux