Re: Packaging Google-Daemon

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Andy Grimm <agrimm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I would vote against changing paths here.  /usr/share/google is not
> that strange.  There are plenty of examples in /usr/share where the
> next directory is for a collection of packages:  games, man, java,
> gems, etc.  Deviating from upstream in this case just complicates
> maintenance of the packages over time.  (If there's some reason the
> files should not be in /usr/share at all, that's a different
> conversation.)


Yeah, you're right. I can think of java doing that and stuff. Besides,
I do not wanna get into the problem of maintaining my own paths.

-- 
It's hard to be free... but I love to struggle. Love isn't asked for;
it's just given. Respect isn't asked for; it's earned!
Renich Bon Ciric

http://www.woralelandia.com/
http://www.introbella.com/
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux