Re: image architecture -- probably no 32-bit for docker, big data?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Agreed, it doesn't make sense to keep 32bit images for these.


On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Sam Kottler <s@xxxxxx> wrote:
On 2014-04-30 21:55, Matthew Miller wrote:
I know we discussed keeping the 32-bit image around, but I don't think we
actually covered the specialized images.

Docker doesn't even support 32 bit hosts -- it may someday, but even then,
the assumption of most containers is gonna be 64-bit x86_64.

And I don't think it makes sense to have a 32-bit big data image, but maybe
I'm wrong on that for certain workloads?

+1 on only supporting a 64-bit image at least for big data and docker. I can't think of any tools or applications thereof that would make sense to run 32-bit but maybe mattf, willb, or others know of some?

_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux