On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Sandro "red" Mathys <red@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We initially planned to make the modular kernel packaging a > self-contained change. But it now seems we also require changes to > Anaconda and yum (and dnf?), so I think this change rather falls into > the category of a system-wide change. According to the rules, I think > it would still be possible to propose the change as a self-contained > change IF we list owners of all affected packages. But changing > kernel, anaconda and yum does seem rather critical to the whole system > so I do think a system-wide change would be much more appropriate. > More so since it might well be that the kernel split does affect more, > as of yet unknown packages. Any objections to change the scope? No objections. Even if this was just contained to the kernel I would have suggested a system-wide change anyway. The more scrutiny the better. josh _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
