On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 19:46:28 +0900 "Sandro \"red\" Mathys" <red@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: <snip> > >> When I took ownership of this "external > >> need" (for the Fedora cloud product) I was under the impression we > >> only just (are going to) have Taskotron and everyone knows it's THE > >> way to go. > > > > I personally love collaboration. It would be awesome if we could > > avoid spreading resources on '3 systems for 1 task'. I definitely > > want to know more about Taskotron and its movement towards cloud > > image testing. > > That's why I was a bit confused to find there's actually 3 systems. > Collaboration is certainly great, but that's not how it's done so > let's try to improve on this. > > So, would you recommend to keep using your tools or rather go with > Taskotron? Or do we do some things in one and others in the other? Or > do we try to fully implement your tests in Taskotron and drop doing > the tests with your tools? I still don't understand why this is an either/or. As I mentioned earlier, Taskotron and valid do not seem to be trying to accomplish the same goals. From what I can see, they should be able to be integrated without too much trouble and I strongly suspect that level of effort would be far less than setting up separate systems. Tim
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
