Re: Cloud image/ kernel/OVS followup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Robyn Bergeron <rbergero@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The third "investigatory point" - which I'm sure most of you guys know anyway - is that including it in the kernel is not really something that is significant in terms of size. But I know we are trying to get down to as small of a footprint as possible. I also don't know if it presents an additional point of failure (could OVS go haywire and break the kernel if it's not being utilized, but just present? more technical things I am not sure about) - but if it does I am sure that might be something to consider.

If it's modular (which it currently is) and nothing is using it, it
won't be loaded.  Nothing will break in that case.  If it is loaded
for some reason, but nothing is using it still then it should still be
relatively risk free.

josh
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux