Fair enough, I get that.
I'm certainly not proposing to change the Fedora vmlinux kernel.On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:04 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Michael Hall <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:The Fedora kernel team would really like to maintain a single kernel
> Awesome work Vaidas!
>
> I am keen to test the KS file, but unfortunately am moving house tomorrow
> and will not be doing much Fedora for maybe two weeks.
>
> For what it's worth I have just joined Git and uploaded a first attempt at
> defining a leaner Fedora 20 kernel:
>
> https://github.com/mjhall/fedora-gce-kernel
>
> Looking forward to getting back into this!
(vmlinux) that is used across the products. That will lead to some
unnecessary things in all of them, but the maintenance burden is
greatly reduced if there is a single vmlinux to triage. We're looking
at splitting up the kernel packaging to make the RPM itself smaller to
help with overall image size.
That being said, if you have found options that can be made modular or
that you think are no longer needed by anything, please let us know.
We're always willing to review config settings.
josh
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct