OK, well I'll continue experimenting anyway.
If anyone has any tips or advice it is certainly welcome.On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Michael Hall <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Your question is timely. The Fedora kernel team has been told that
> Thanks Truong, I am using that page.
> What I would like to know is how much I can safely disable in the kernel.
> Does anyone have a list of what most VM images don't need?
> For example, it seems that most hardware support can go, and most filesystem
> support that isn't needed.
> I would like to build a s small a kernel as possible that will still
> function securely.
the Cloud people would like a smaller kernel package, but nobody has
actually come forward with what that means. So I'm interested in
seeing what the Cloud experts reply with, because we're already doing
work on the kernel to split it up to make it smaller. The mechanics
of that are somewhat simple, but the content is the part we're
blocking on.
(NOTE: This is for Fedora.next, not F20 so whatever you're doing is
likely unaffected.)
josh
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
