Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 02:18:56PM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> > I'm more concerned about /var/cache/yum, since that is already precreated >> > and should already be right. >> > >> Any chance this is something mounted on that directory? That the relabel is >> not hitting the inode? >> >> Another option would be to just remove this directory. Especially if there is >> not content. yum would recreate it on the update. > > Okay, I'll try that and see how it goes. But note that the fix for the other > files was to precreate them -- I'm not... actually sure why that works, but > it indicates that something isn't happening right when new files are created > at runtime. I've been meaning to talk to you about that. :) I tried installing F20 from ISO and '/var/cache/yum' has proper 'rpm_var_cache_t' context after install. It seems anaconda has hackaround for that: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/anaconda.git/tree/data/post-scripts/80-setfilecons.ks I have an (crazy?) idea about how it happened: '/var/cache/yum' belongs to yum and can be installed really early in the install queue before selinux policy is installed. So it gets default 'file_t' instead of 'rpm_var_cache_t'. -- Vitaly Kuznetsov _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
