On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 13:45 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 05:13:40PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > > So we are not going to be able to do this period. you will only be > > > > able to release as Fedora itself releases. doing periodic updated > > > > images can be doable [...] > > I think that some of the wording used is poorly chosen. > > I think you are actually talking about updates images and not release > > images. We have no way to determine how big an update set is so that > > I'm not sure I understand the distinction you are making here. The images > would need to be stand-alone, with all packages included, not just updates. I _think_ Dennis here is talking about the difference between fedora/updates ... and that if we have a "release" image of say F21 then that would be thought of like the fedora tree/repo. and couldn't be changed ever. But that's not we want to do anyway. And we could do "update" images, which would be new images in addition to the release image (what we all want, I think). _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
