On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 09:06:30AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > You have basically the top-level landing page for the WG there. It > has all the relevant information one would expect, but I think some of > the sections go beyond governance. Specifically, the Mission, Role in > Fedora, and Communications section aren't really related to the > governance _of_ the WG. Maybe create a ==Governance== section and > split it to it's own page? Yeah, that's good feedback. Some of it is more "charter" than "governance". > Under the membership section, you don't have anything regarding what > happens if you have a member relinquish their seat. I added the > following to the Workstation draft. Just an FYI: *nod* I think that partly depends on whether we want to follow the election or appointee model. -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
