Re: Fedora Cloud Working Group (members, everyone, and what's next)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matthew Miller" <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Fedora Cloud SIG" <cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 9:33:43 AM
> Subject: Fedora Cloud Working Group (members, everyone, and what's next)
> 
> Hello everyone. FESCo has approved the initial slate of voting members in
> the Fedora Cloud Working Group. That is:
> 
>  * James Antill
>  * Robyn Bergeron
>  * Joe Brockmeier
>  * Haïkel Guémar
>  * Sam Kottler
>  * Sandro Mathys
>  * Matthew Miller
>  * Frankie Onuonga
>  * Mattias Runge
> 
> Our next two steps are to 1) document a governance model and 2) start
> working on a product requirements document.
> 
> As we work on these things, we'll need a place to communicate. I suggest
> that we primarily use this list, plus chat on #fedora-cloud on Freenode. We
> have some geographical distribution -- I'm going to try to see if we can
> find a time for an IRC meeting at least initially.
> 
> This doesn't mean that we're taking over this list for just this purpose --
> the Cloud SIG remains a place to talk about and work on all things cloud,
> and I think we can handle the overlap (especially since it's not super-high
> traffic). Also, as I hope I've made clear, the working group can't possibly
> do all of the things that needs to be done; everyone on the committee will
> have an active role in actually doing things, but we also will act as
> enablers for other people's contributions.
> 
> Unless anyone objects, or is really, really excited about doing it, I'm
> going to start on a basic strawman governance document. Things like what
> constitues a binding vote, how we handle succession that kind of thing. Then
> we can discuss and improve that. This needs to be done by November 15th,
> although I'm kind of hoping that it'll be so uncomplicated that it won't
> take that long.
> 
> Likewise, I can start on a skeleton for a PRD, but if anyone in the group
> has more experience at doing that than I have (I come from a sysadmin
> background, not one where I've worked on shipping products) I'll happily and
> immediately defer. (This, by the way, needs to be done by January
> somethingth, which sounded a long way away when this idea was drafted but
> doesn't anymore when I look at the holiday calendar.)

I can hack out the basic framework for a PRD, I have been through those processes a zillion times.

(Granted, my ability to actually fill it out with technical jargon that makes any sense may be limited, but it can give us a start anyway... normally i have come at this from the angle of making a marketing req. doc. - "what people want to have as far as usability / functionality" and that drives what technical bits come together in the PRD to make those wants happen, but i am sure we can wing it.)

-r


> 
> 
> 
> --
> Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> _______________________________________________
> cloud mailing list
> cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> 
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux