----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sam Kottler" <skottler@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Fedora Cloud SIG" <cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 3:02:05 PM > Subject: Re: Test Results for F19 EC2 AMIs > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Tim Flink" <tflink@xxxxxxxxxx> > > To: cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 2:46:22 PM > > Subject: Test Results for F19 EC2 AMIs > > > > We have a little over a week until the first F19 final go/no-go meeting > > (where we decide whether or not the release is done) and there are no > > posted results for F19 final AMI tests yet. > > > > If you have been testing the AMIs, please report your results. If you > > haven't been testing them but are interested in doing so - please do. > > Show stoppers for the AMIs are likely to be release blocking and the > > sooner that those issues are discovered, the less likely that we'll > > slip the F19 final release. > > In my opinion there should be an account for people to use to test the > images. Access could be granted via IAM and resources could be limited that > way. Why go that route vs. simply publishing the images for anyone to test? The advantage I see to what you're saying is that people don't have to basically spend their own money to test images - but by the same token I don't think we want to limit it only to that group. I've set up stuff on the community-cloud account for usage with IAM before - it's been a while but I seem to recall it was slightly tedious but reasonable enough for one-off events (having test accounts for an event, for example) - but if we started doling out access with every TC/RC I'd probably want to figure out how to get that scripted into being part of releng processes. I could probably write it but at some point I have to imagine that what would take me a week would probably take someone else very very little time :) Thoughts? Garrett - since you're the one who helped me with the IAM stuff and wrote the wiki instructions and whatnot - do you think that could somehow be tied into FAS groups or something? -r > > > > > To report results or to find test cases, please visit: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test > > > > This will redirect to the most recent spin (TC5 at the time of this > > email). > > > > The relevant test cases are: > > - QA:Testcase_EC2_AMI_Validation > > - QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_Xen_Para_Virt > > > > There are links to the specific test cases from the test matrices and > > result reporting is just editing the wiki page (there are example > > result formats on the page as well). > > > > Thanks, > > > > Tim > > > > _______________________________________________ > > cloud mailing list > > cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud > > > _______________________________________________ > cloud mailing list > cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud > _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
