On 04/18/2013 08:06 PM, Dmitry Makovey wrote: > On 04/18/2013 08:59 AM, Matthias Runge wrote: >> On 04/16/2013 02:01 PM, Dmitry Makovey wrote: >> >> >>> Now before I go any further in my development - was there any >>> other effort attempting to solve that same problem? I haven't found >>> anything. RH's packstack is nice but it won't work in scenarios >>> where servers are not allowed to go out and grab their own packages >>> via yum (in our case we're *pushing* them to servers from a central >>> location instead via cpacman). >> >> Dmitry, >> >> sample-data belongs to keystone, which is an OpenStack component. I'd >> ask directly at openstack-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Still, I wouldn't recommend to modify it for configuration of your >> environment. >> >> It is absolutely possible to pre-install a host with all required >> packages and to configure it later via packstack, without any external >> network access. > > is there any information someplace how to setup multinode OpenStack > infrastructure? What I want is 2 nova compute nodes, 2 cinder nodes, > etc. etc. etc. My impression from packstack was that it can't do that > as-is so it still means getting close and personal with "under the hood" > things. Am I wrong with that assumption? Hi Dmitry, packstack can install multiple compute nodes, just set CONFIG_NOVA_COMPUTE_HOSTS to a comma separated list of hosts. But for cinder (and most other non swift storage services) only a single node is installed, so it might get to part of the way to your target. thanks, Derek. > > > > _______________________________________________ > cloud mailing list > cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud > _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
