On 02/27/2013 04:36 PM, Giulio Fidente wrote: > On 02/26/2013 08:40 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 06:05:45PM +0100, Giulio Fidente wrote: >>> I was wondering if there is any work ongoing to announce those more >>> officially or if any help is wanted to rebuild/maintain some more images >> >> Hi Giulio. I'm glad you found those images helpful. There *is* a plan to >> make more-official images for Fedora 19, and you can see that at >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FirstClassCloudImages. A lot of this >> is internal infrastructure work, but I'm sure we can find some way to fit in >> your skills. > > I like the plan a lot, it looks like the major issue now is the > integration of imgfac/oz with koji > > I happen to have worked with imgfac and know decently its REST interface > but, for the scope of this project, can't we just stick to Oz? > > I don't think imgfac would add much to the process while it will instead > prevent us from passing customized kickstarts to Oz Given the current choices, IMO, Oz seems reasonable. It's been tested for more than a couple of years, being used by Rackspace, & other communities. On a relevant note, there's further work being done in this area by Dan Berrange to consolidate using libosinfo [1] -- https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NovaImageBuilding (Don't forget to notice this clarification at the top, before reading it further.) [1] http://libosinfo.org/ > > this said, I think I could help with koji... who should I ping? > >> You may also be interested in >> http://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/cloud-kickstarts.git/tree/generic, which is >> the source repository for the kickstart files from which the image is >> generated. Any improvements/suggestions/patches are welcome. > > would it be worth trying some ARM build? > -- /kashyap _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
