Re: future of Boxgrinder ... building cloud images

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:32:09AM -0500, Andy Grimm wrote:
> +1 ... those conversations are mostly just bikeshedding.  In an ideal
> world, users will be comfortable enough with image building that
> having an "official" image will be mostly meaningless.  I think that
> the world of cloud users isn't quite there yet, for whatever reason.
> What we provide them as a default image in the meantime should be a
> useful set of packages, not an absolutely minimal one, but that's the
> not goal being pursued.

I'm unclear on what you mean here. What is not the goal being pursued, by
whom?


-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux