On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 09:58:04PM -0800, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: > How much memory does firewalld actually use on F18 when it has > nothing to do? 16MB? That's not the end of the world, but it's bigger than anything else running in the cloud image. (In fact, excepting dhclient, it's bigger than *everything else put together*.) > At what point should we become concerned about how > much memory a process is using? I don't have a magic number, but I think we want to be concerned about all resource waste, because it does add up. > Does the "no firewall" case still work, at least? EC2 recommends > images with *no* default firewall since they use security groups to > control traffic, and adding a second, guest-level firewall tends to > confuse people. The current situation is that it works, but only by removing stuff in kickstart post. > Should the F18 release image explicitly target clouds other than > EC2? *Can* it? Yes, but I think we'll end up with two different kickstarts. (The EC2 image won't need grub, for example.) I'm open to just leaving it off for the EC2 image in specific. -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
