Re: keystone config file defaults

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




----- Original Message -----
> From: "Adam Young" <ayoung@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 12:40:51 PM
> Subject: Re: keystone config file defaults
> 
> I'd say, no.  We should not be setting a default at all.  Ther is a
> readically different approach between Fedora and Debian regarding
> thee
> state that an application is in post Package install.  The Debian
> approach will make you go through  the configuration,  and leave you
> with a working application.  THe Fedora approach assumes that you are
> doing an unattended  install and upgrade,  and that you will
> configure
> the application afterwards.

Hmmm. Good points. One thing I *really* dislike about the Ubuntu packages for example is that they automatically start up the various services when you install a package. This can get sort of tricky when you try to deal with that in combination with configuration management. As for defaults however... it seems reasonable to default to something more robust than the key/value store backend.

I'd say SQLite is a good middle ground as a default.


> 
> Our sample configuration file should instead be commented to show the
> user what they need to set in order to get the various back ends
> working.  But assuming MySQL,  SQLITE,  or LDAP,  will be wrong for
> some
> subset of users.
> 
> 
> On 02/22/2012 12:30 PM, Dan Prince wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Alan Pevec"<apevec@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> To: "Fedora Cloud SIG"<cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 12:14:29 PM
> >> Subject: Re: keystone config file defaults
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Dan Prince<dprince@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
> >>> Reverse that diff!
> >>>
> >>> 26c27
> >>> <  driver = keystone.identity.backends.kvs.Identity
> >>> ---
> >>>> driver = keystone.identity.backends.sql.Identity
> >> yeah, I do that
> >> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=openstack-keystone.git;a=commitdiff;h=074d4a0762a33d2b020920be3650849cf2f69ea0
> > Ah. Thanks Alan. I must have pulled it just before that change went
> > in this morning.
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
> >> Next on my list is to switch to mysql, same like openstack-nova
> >> RPM.
> > Sounds good.
> >
> >> Alan
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cloud mailing list
> >> cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > cloud mailing list
> > cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cloud mailing list
> cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
> 
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux