On Thursday, January 05, 2012 02:30:02 PM Robyn Bergeron wrote: > On 01/04/2012 06:29 PM, Jaime Melis wrote: > > Hello Denis, > > > > Thanks a lot for your help, it definitely cleared things up, and > > happily the process is simpler than what I though it would be, which > > is nice. > > > > We've made the feature ready for wrangler. > > Cool, I will take a look at it and send it over to FESCo for approval if > it looks good. :) > > Thanks! > > -Robyn Thanks Robyn, If there's stuff missing let me and Jaime know and I'll fix it accordingly. > > > Thanks again, > > Jaime > > > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Denis Arnaud > > > > <denis.arnaud_fedora@xxxxxxx <mailto:denis.arnaud_fedora@xxxxxxx>> wrote: > > Dear Jaime, > > > > We're a few weeks away from F17 features submission deadline > > and we've been working hard (especially Shaw Starr - CC) in > > submitting OpenNebula package dependencies. OpenNebula would > > even work without those not yet complete dependencies since > > they're mostly ruby gems which speed up OpenNebula (although > > we're confident they will all be there for the submission > > deadline), so we would like to move on to the next stage and > > start submitting OpenNebula for feature review to get it > > approved. Could anyone help us out with the process we must > > follow to get OpenNebula to be an accepted feature? > > > > AFAIU, you can submit the feature for approval by Fesco. There > > should be a Fesco meeting tonight, I believe. As a reminder, the > > feature process is described on the Fedora Wiki: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy. In particular, the > > acceptance criteria > > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy/Acceptance) seem > > all be met by OpenNebula. > > All the tasks of the feature are not required to be completed for > > the feature approval. Rather, they need to be completed for the > > Fedora 17 freeze (which will come shortly). > > > > So, regarding the acceptance process, the only thing you have to > > do *for now* > > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy/Milestones), is: > > "1. The Feature Owner adds the feature page to > > Category:FeatureReadyForWrangler > > <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:FeatureReadyForWrangler> > > by adding the following text to the bottom of their feature page: > > *Category:FeatureReadyForWrangler > > <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:FeatureReadyForWrangler>*--it > > is already in the feature template > > <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/EmptyTemplate>." > > > > Note that you can also refer to the features submitted by similar > > projects: OpenStack > > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/OpenStack), > > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Aeolus_Conductor), > > Sheepdog (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Sheepdog) and > > HekaFS (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/HekaFS) for Fedora > > 16, as well as BoxGrinder > > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/BoxGrinder) for Fedora 15. > > > > Does it seem clearer? > > > > Best regards > > > > Denis > > > > _______________________________________________ > > cloud mailing list > > cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
