On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 22:59 -0400, David Nalley wrote: > Hi folks, > > I spent some time today trying to get ceph updated, and I pushed 0.37 > to rawhide[0]. > > I would like to solicit thoughts on pushing this to F16. > While this fixes 5 bugs in Fedora's bug tracker (and to be fair, 2 of > them are easily fixed in the current version) there are a number of > bugs fixed in the 4 months since 0.31 was released. > The downside - a number of binaries and libraries have changed name[1], > Technically this probably runs afoul of the updates policy, but ceph > appears to be a leaf package if repoquery is to be believed, and it's > still on the same major version number :). It's also true that there > isn't really the idea of a supported version of Ceph since it's still > very rapidly in development and considered quite bleeding edge. > > Thoughts, comments, flames? > > --David > > [0] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3491795 > [1] http://marc.info/?l=ceph-devel&m=131673402621436&w=2 For what little my opinion is worth, I'd say go for it. Jonathan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
