On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:52, David Nalley <david@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731712 >>> >>> The HekaFS maintainers were looking for a appropriate group for their >>> package. I was thinking that perhaps having a 'cloud infrastructure' >>> or 'cloud support' group might be the best place, but we don't have >>> one of those, and I'm not sure what all packages should be in it. >>> >>> Would someone fom the Cloud SIG like to take a stab at it? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Bill >>> >> >> >> While I am happy to do this, haven't we already hit string freeze for >> F16 (August 2nd per the schedule)? So we are talking about >> comps-f17.xml.in? >> >> If I were to do so I think I'd put the following in the group: >> >> eucatools >> aeolus >> deltacloud >> sheepdog >> ceph >> glusterfs >> hekafs >> boxgrinder > > I am guessing that there will also be a need to have what is optional > and required... I would possibly suggest that they're all optional, there's lots of different cloud technologies there a lot of which are completely standalone separate products that aren't required to interoperate. By having them all optional there's a menu with the list there and people can select the particular type of cloud technologies they wish to use. Peter _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
