On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 08:19:29AM -0500, Justin M. Forbes wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:38:45AM -0500, Justin M. Forbes wrote: > > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 08:42:29AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:46:22PM -0500, Justin M. Forbes wrote: > > > > There has been a lack of participation at our weekly meeting the past > > > > couple of weeks. I am wondering if Thursdays at 17:00EST is still a good > > > > time for everyone, or if we would get better participation at some other > > > > time. Would another time perhaps work better for everyone? > > > > > > I've found that using a web app like http://whenisgood.net is far > > > superior than general calls for people's schedules, which are hard to > > > collate via an email list. > > > > > Thanks for the great idea :) Okay, if everyone could respond to > > http://whenisgood.net/i4nhgw we can see what time works best. Thanks. > > After getting a good bit of feedback, it seems like the best time was our > original time, before the DST adjustment. So lets do Thursdays at 16:00 > EST. > Err, make that 16:00 EDT (20:00 UTC). -- Justin M. Forbes
