On 04/29/2010 06:03 PM, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote: > > Thanks, zodbot! > > <zodbot> Minutes: > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-04-29/cloud-sig.2010-04-29-21.00.html > <zodbot> Minutes (text): > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-04-29/cloud-sig.2010-04-29-21.00.txt > <zodbot> Log: > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-04-29/cloud-sig.2010-04-29-21.00.log.html > > The big takeaway from my perspective: we need as much help as we can get > to create an F12 image that boots on RHEL 5.5 + Xen. Then we take *that* > image and test it on EC2. It may well fail, since it appears that they're > running a Frankenstein RHEL 5.(0-2), but at least we'll be able to isolate > their failures, demonstrate that we've got our stuff working, and put > pressure on them to fix if need be. > > <gregdek> OK, so to recap the plan: > <gregdek> * huff will post the latest ks and tools he's been using to get Latests version of the ks file is here: http://github.com/huff/kickstart-stuff/blob/master/fedora-ec2-min.ks to generate the image run the command: # mkdir include (this is for the kernels) # appliance-creator --cache /var/cache/ac/ -d -v -i ./include -n fedora-ec2-image -c http://github.com/huff/kickstart-stuff/raw/master/fedora-ec2-min.ks I ran some tests tonight and was able to boot this image in kvm on f12 with no selinux issues, I did have to change the fs=label, and fstabb/c kvm did not like xvda, but had no problem booting this image. I was not able to test in xen however. If someone could provide me with example xen paravirt config file (non hvm), I will try and test in xen tomorrow. -D